Search

Kentucky: 8/1 - 8/31/2010Reply
can all of you be so kind and please give me your opinion about the below image? I have been creating a spreadsheet using several metrics to try and increase my odds of hitting numbers. Below is an image of one of those metrics that will eventually tie into other data sets. Can you tell me which of the two images below is easier to read? Basically, I have 500 draws calculated by ball rank and ball count. If you can give me your opinion on which, if any of these 2 images look more appealing to
Aug 15, 2010, 5:39 pm - Guest - Pick 3 Forum

Man wins Fla. Lottery jackpot for 7th timeReply
Congrats! Granted the magnitude of the game odds aren't astronomical, but it can be done. I guarantee you he uses a methodology that includes more than one or two criteria and he sticks to it! With his initial big bankroll he widened his game playability and is smacking it with great repeatable results.........................he hasn't lost his composure..........very admirable to say the least. There will be those that say Well he didn't hit PBall or Mega! ...................................
Aug 14, 2010, 7:59 pm - jarasan - Lottery News

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
RJOH That doesn't mean every player with a system has that advantage. (True I wasn't saying otherwise just like with quick-picks some players win using them while others do not and the same goes with systems and strategies but for different reasons not everyone is capable of using a system properly just like with software I've hit using a program that another player from this forum had and they weren't able too win using it.With quick-picks it's based on the odds if your chances are
Aug 14, 2010, 1:00 pm - LotteryTechInc - Lottery Discussion Forum

2 quick Lotto Texas winners put state in bindReply
Ohio had a similar problem at one time. Ohio use to have a state lottery game that started at $4M and grew $4M each draw. After surrounding states started their own games and Ohio lost out of state players, they changed their game by starting it at $4M and increasing it by $2M each draw and when that didn't work they got rid of it and replaced it with Lot'O Play which they said would be more fun even though its tickets were $2 ea. with higher odds and paid out less. After a year they go
Aug 14, 2010, 12:26 pm - RJOh - Lottery News

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
after DD ran is wayward scooter straight into the non social skills curb awhile back, i thought is temp 'abscence' equaled him acquiring gary busey approved social 12step rehab. it appears he has relapsed. i should have laid odds that he would........cuz i know people
Aug 12, 2010, 1:38 am - visiondude - Lottery Discussion Forum

How many of you??Reply
I was thinking of asking this myself. I think a lot of people here have a feeling they're going to hit it big eventually. I'll admit that I do. But really, isn't that why we still play the lottery, because we think we'll win? It's not like you'd play and have the thought of I'm never going to win this thing , at least part of you believes you'll eventually win. The main question I have is why do we think we'll win when the odds are so against us. Is it fate? Luck? A gift from abo
Aug 9, 2010, 8:40 am - ttech10 - Lottery Discussion Forum

POLL - On The Whole Do The Lotteries Provide Truly Random Numbers?Reply
How about we try to predict one event out of 10? Or 20? or even 30? Will that work? Can we find an algorithym that will, with certainty, predict one out of 30? If you have truely deep pockets you can go as high as one out of 100. I firmly believe such a scenario is possible. You aren't the only one to believe such a scenario is possible, the odds of producing a line that pays when playing the MM or PB are 1:40 and 1:35. Since there are 4,405,086 to 5,560,464 combinations that will win s
Aug 8, 2010, 3:26 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

What's your poison?Reply
wheeltowin. Now I'm playing little lotto and don't bat an eye over $50 a draw if I feel I have a good shot at 100k+. Personally I think that's a little strong for that game. The most common jackpot payout is $175,000to a solo winner, but there are shared jackpots. I think the most winners for one draw have been five or six, but it does happen. The odds are lower than Pcik 6 and 5 + 1 games, but by no means are they low .
Aug 8, 2010, 12:54 pm - Coin Toss - Lottery Discussion Forum

What's your poison?Reply
I play mostly jackpot games just because I want to retire so bad. I do play P4 and once in a while P3. I play Tx Cash 5 on and off, but I don't like it that much because the odds are really high (435897 to 1) for a jackpot that MIGHT hit 25K. And it's parimutuel. AND it doesn't grow if no one hits. It just sucks. I used to play $40 or $50 a day on P3, and did ok, but it was too much work to win a few bucks. Now I play $20 to $30 a week, and I think that's too much, but, can't help myself.
Aug 8, 2010, 10:05 am - rcbbuckeye - Lottery Discussion Forum

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
Well, no I don't write programs, and all those formulas you wrote don't mean anything to me. I only checked the results for this year because that's all I had time to do this morning before work. 4 draws out of 186 draws is about 2%. It's a simple matter (but time consuming) to just go back through the past draws and count. If I have time I'll go back farther, but I can safely say that 3 successive numbers in a draw in Tx Cash 5 does not happen frequently...certainly not frequent enough that I w
Aug 6, 2010, 11:08 pm - rcbbuckeye - Lottery Discussion Forum