Search

Could you Honestly say:Reply
I voted yes, because a promise is a promise and I do not betray a confidence. I would not want someone to do it to me so, therefore, I do not do it to anyone else. I would also say it would be nice to be on the self serving side and win some real money. I would share but it would be if the winnings were large. I would keep the system to myself. Human nature is such that you would be taken advantage of if you did devulge a consistant system to everyone. If too much winning started and
Nov 6, 2006, 1:40 am - floridian - Lottery Discussion Forum

States that do not follow the rules...
Basically, I am asking the people who keep track of several states which one(s) they feel don't follow the normal trapping rules? (sums, roots, digits out, evens, odds, etc...) From my own experience, I would go broke in a heartbeat if I had to play in SC or OH only. Their games seem to defy all the rules that work fairly well in other states. TN is not far behind... Which states drive you up the wall the most? Thanks for voting, Bryan :)
Nov 5, 2006, 11:45 pm - Bryan - Pick 3 Forum

'System' componentsReply
You pay attention, record it, watch what happens, record what happened, remember it, so that when it happens again you'll have an idea what to do. Then when it happens again with a different variation (curve ball), you pay attention again. (that's for the folks who say no system works 100 percent-it's us who don't work 100 %) Then after it happens again and repeat the first variation, you have the patterns, and trend with that one thing, for the most part. Then you can take'em to the bank. A
Nov 3, 2006, 6:10 pm - Tenaj - Lottery Systems Forum

Personal NumbersReply
1) If there is a bias in the ballsets and ball machines, I don't see it, and I've spent time looking. 2) Unless a person plays a QP, then you gotta play something that is construed as a 'system'. 3) Would you play all 6 of the longest shots in one game ? NOBODY has affirmed that they do, so that leads me to believe folks DO NOT believe so much on the odds or probability that all things are equal when clearly, they are not. 4) Depending on how the floor is waxed, if the
Oct 30, 2006, 1:53 pm - guesser - Jackpot Games Forum

Personal NumbersReply
AYE, guesser, I agree. Chose a system and stick to it. It is not solely mathematical, because those little balls do not obey purely mathematical rules. Odds, statistics, probabilities and all that stuff is for numbers, abstract constructions, that are on paper and in our minds. Every draw has so many differing influences due to the human involvement in every draw, which affects the outcome. Also, not only people affect the outcomes but room temperature, humidity, dirt, an earthquake in North
Oct 29, 2006, 11:44 pm - jarasan - Jackpot Games Forum

Personal NumbersReply
That's my theory too, Brad. I cannot ever predict 'numbers', I just play tendencies: For example if the prior 3 games all had 2 or more numbers from between 20-29 hit, the 'probability' of that happening in a 4th game just isn't very good. I CAN tell you most games have one grouping, and in a lot of cases two groupings, I may be able to tell you which grouping NOT to play, but I can't tell you which ones TO play. RJ: That's what I've been saying also: different 'numbers' have di
Oct 28, 2006, 9:53 pm - guesser - Jackpot Games Forum

Personal NumbersReply
For the record, I don't think numbers 'even out', I have too much data to say it doesn't. See Red Ball #40 for further clarification of one example. There are noticeable trends or scenarios, but those scenarios won't point you to specific numbers, THOSE you have to pick on your own. Case in point - we just had 4 numbers from the basic '40 group' hit - the odds are kinda rare for that to occur again in the near future, so there is one scenario for you - don't play 4 numbers from the
Oct 28, 2006, 1:01 am - guesser - Jackpot Games Forum

Tip For Any System UsedReply
RJOH...tell me where you read that the QP system usually picks a winner when it has picked about 50% of the possible combinations. If that were the case a MM draw would have had to sell an astronomical amount of tickets. Let's review the last MM winner (October 17th for $55m) which was won by a quick pick. There were $18,325,611 tickets sold for that draw. If 70% were quick picks (a good number) that means there were 12.8 million or so quick picks for this draw. Based upon odds of 1:175M
Oct 27, 2006, 12:06 pm - CA LotteryGuy - Lottery Systems Forum

Sc Pick 4
MIDDAY PICK 3 195 EvE PICK 4 5195 EVE PICK 3 795 Should I Play 2795 What Other Numbers Should Be Played To Cover The Odds? 4 #
Oct 27, 2006, 8:31 am - dsparks9 - Pick 4 Forum

Life without Quick Picks...
Have you ever thought, what will happen if quick picks hadn't been invented? I sometimes wonder how people in the 18 century(1700's) did to play lottery, a time where quick pick, I am sure, didn't exist.. What you think would happen if quick pick didn't exist? I am greatly thankful for your input... Second question: Do you think that if quick pick hadn't been invented that they would have lowered the Powerball Matrix... I think that if quick pick hadn't been invented Powerball odds woul
Oct 26, 2006, 12:52 am - pumpi76 - Lottery Discussion Forum