Search

Can math and logic improve chances of winning a jackpot?Reply
Don Catlin is one of over 50 people who writes articles for Casino City Times and I'm one of almost 145,000 that posts on Lottery Post. We can sum up all of Catlin's knowledge about lottery play by reading his article about Richard Lustig. There are several topics about Lustig on LP that basically make the same conclusions as Catlin. It's possible Catlin never read the book and his article is nothing but quotes from LP. http://catlin.casinocitytimes.com/article/lottery-nonsense-61784 From
Jul 3, 2013, 12:57 pm - Stack47 - Mathematics Forum

One more Trap for a P-3 number// Consec pairsReply
Thanks Jim..... yeah that was such a mean time for us. We were in lottery hell. LOL I think only one other time in Ga history did we get that many doubles in a row. Notice the doubles that hit just before those too. We actually had 9 doubles in 10 draws! Oh, brother that will sure clear your sinuses for ya. LOL Then we had 8 more consecutive numbers ....one of which was a another double. That's when I think my dizzy spells started ....and I went on vacation. LOL I guess I sho
Jul 1, 2013, 8:42 pm - WIN D - Lottery Systems Forum

How many play numbers to win at Pick 3 ?Reply
Laker ben ..... You miss the point again lakerben ! You definitely can not read. Your hijacking and you are off subject again. You are a very persistent ...sneaky ...stubborn fella. We have ask you not to feel like you must insert yourself with your special opinions and views on off topic stuff. People don't like it. Manners count. ....they still count. RL basically said the same thing ....only more eloquently. My statement was more in the form of a challenge for folks wantin
Jun 22, 2013, 8:10 pm - WIN D - Lottery Systems Forum

Post your scratch ticket resultsReply
No offesnse but that app is garbage. The stats it uses are based on all prize levels. the games you speak of have over a million break even prizes so those games appear to be better than others available. If its me playing I want more than my money back. I go right to the pa site and check the stats or odds for prizes of $500 and up. Some are drastically better for some tickets of the same price than others. also I always look to see how many were printed. Hey good luck t
Jun 22, 2013, 9:09 am - Chris$ - Instant ("Scratch-Off") Games Forum

Rl's daily game softwareReply
Hi all I just updated my MO games and noticed that the mid-day and eveing drawings were both 0-7-0. I know that the odds are 1 in 1000 and it never increases or decreases but I find it a little weird that it happened in the next drawing after CW's above post. It would be nice to view the videos made inside that little glass room, maybe some day we should demand a audit. RL
Jun 20, 2013, 2:13 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Lottery Systems Forum

Can MM & PB Start Being Honest? Must this farce continue?Reply
Remember the fact that as a lottery player you're taking all the risk by wagering your money against astronomical odds, the government takes no risk and wagers nothing but in a sense, they are your partner because when or if you win, they take half. If you know before buying a ticket the government is going to take half the winnings, you know you're betting on winning half the jackpot. The same is true with the advertised payment prize. By taking the cash, you'll probably get about 40% of t
Jun 18, 2013, 5:22 pm - Stack47 - Lottery Discussion Forum

How to use Lotto-logix?Reply
Maybe there are some Big Blues on the trash heap out back we could cobble together. There have been some lottery software's that played thousands of systems against game history to find the top 10. The trouble with the concept was all the systems were simple, +1, +2, +3, etc. with no way of the user adding a system. Wonder if the best system to date would stop winnning the moment it was found. There are really two kinds of systems: Those that play at house odds and if you do
Jun 18, 2013, 5:52 am - BobP - Lottery Systems Forum

Texas: 6/1 - 6/30/2013Reply
Did a little something I expected with the 431 drawing. Figured it would stay small (Sum 1-10) which it did. Also figured it would be an either/or on the 411 draw. Either both digits would repeat or neither of the digits would repeat. Was waiting on the Pre-Test to make my final decision. With the Odds against the Pre-Test split doing another 1/2 split when I saw the results and the 4 was not in the Pre-Test I zigged when I should have zagged. I eliminated the 2 digit repeat of 41 and went wi
Jun 12, 2013, 2:28 pm - Clipper - Pick 3 Forum

Georgia: 6/1 - 6/30/2013Reply
Thanks Jack.... We're looking at someone's big future hit when that Evening String snaps. I love it when there is just no way out for those trapped numbers! The odds say most strings are broken with a double and so........ You just have to love these Strings if your a serious player.... cause there's just NO WAY out for these bad boys. We can get all our frustrations out on these big time! They're trapped in a burning cabin ......and we know .....we know they have to come runni
Jun 12, 2013, 11:58 am - WIN D - Pick 3 Forum

RL's Digit Master Pro Big Game software download.Reply
Thanks WinD I think that pretty much sums it up! I might be the exception but I think I would probably rather wait and target a double in its 28% hit expectancy versus a single in it's 72% hit expectancy. If I made 3 High/Low decisions I would reduce the matrix to 125 numbers with expected hits 12.5% of the time and not worry about singles, doubles, or triples. To successfully select N1 thru N6 would be 120 numbers with odds of 1/6 * .720 or 12% hit expectancy. Which is easier 3 sele
Jun 10, 2013, 8:55 am - jimjwright - Lottery Systems Forum