Search

End of game schedule / Top prizes not yet claimedReply
Ahhh the middle man. Very informative post- thanks again! I was just trying to figure out how many retailers there might be in IL- best guess 5-10K. CA bigger market than IL. IL has at least one scratcher with 7 mil odds- $20 ticket. So once again, transparency is key as you indicated before. Without knowing the volume of sales for a particular game, in addition to exactly knowing when and where the jackpots were sold well, then you best have lady luck on your side. Either way, I ll
Feb 23, 2013, 12:14 am - Romancandle - Instant ("Scratch-Off") Games Forum

Some new results on some old techniques.Reply
Alright, I've managed to figure out a way to show two numbers that hit nearly everytime. (So far, 30 out of 40 games). Thru testing, making and everything else there just isn't enough time to do everything. Well, I should back up a little. Either in K85 or O85, at least one number shows up here that has hit 30 out of 40 games. I need to go back and test a few months worth to make sure it has done this for a while. With what I've tested so far though, it's all been showing pretty much the same th
Feb 22, 2013, 4:15 am - Greenfox - Mathematics Forum

Do some number combinations have better odds?Reply
If I ever took the time to generate 28 numbers, I would be reluctant to post them - for fear some unsuspecting visitor might use them and possibly lose money. You have no reason to be concerned about that Bobby623. What you should be concerned about is the time you might spend generating the 28 numbers. If you've been following this thread recently, you should have noticed that RJOh found that the set [1..28] performed comparably to thousands of random sets that I generated over 798 draw
Feb 20, 2013, 5:45 pm - jimmy4164 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Do some number combinations have better odds?Reply
Does it make more sense to discuss the possibilities of better playing strategies Yes it does make sense Stack. We are posting on LP where people are looking for creative ways to win no matter how much the critics tell us it's impossible Besides, I really don't see the harm in TRYING to find ways to get BETTER ODDS using groups of numbers as apposed to QPs. It's impossible didn't stop the first transcontinental ocean voyage. It's impossible didn't stop the Wright Brothers from taking
Feb 16, 2013, 3:02 pm - Ronnie316 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Do some number combinations have better odds?Reply
Any strategy is much better than trying to get lucky with QPs. I agree Stack. I have seen on the Internet that it has been proven scientifically that a group (or block) of combinations will win with more consistency and regularity than random lines. (as in QPs) Even though the number of wins would even out over time, the random lines tended to be sporadic and unpredictable. What I believe is, they only tested set groups and failed to realize that the patterns would be magnified if the ran
Feb 15, 2013, 4:52 pm - Ronnie316 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Do some number combinations have better odds?Reply
Boney526, I think I'm done here too. It might have been worth pursuing if we had at least gotten an occasional post from a stranger indicating they had learned something from our efforts. There are either no people reading here with the courage to oppose the loud mouths trying to discredit sound scientific reasoning, or they are all just a bunch of blithering idiots. It's ironic how clueless people like Ronnie316 are when it comes to odds. If he ever discovers that casino slot machines and
Feb 10, 2013, 6:36 pm - jimmy4164 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Do some number combinations have better odds?Reply
Stack47, asks, What am I missing? After saying: A 20% chance a winning ticket was sold times the chance of one out of over 32 million, but you're still saying nobody beat the odds . A grasp of the fundamentals of mathematics, in particular, Probability theory. Which part of 32 million in ticket sales is about 20% of the total combos did I miss? Which part of there was only one winning ticket out of 32 million did I miss, Jimmy? You're starting to become a troll; and oh BTW
Feb 10, 2013, 12:53 am - Stack47 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Texas All or NothingReply
Like I've said before.... if you know 1 digit that is going to play and what position it will be in you will have 1 in 100 Odds. You can take $50.00, play all 100 at 50 cents each and win $250.00. Do that twice a day and you make $500 per day. I could live on that. Get you a bunch of game cards and pre-mark them in sets of 100. Would take you 20 slips per 100 set. Recycle your game cards. Then work on figuring out that 1 digit that is going to play which most of the time will come from the
Feb 9, 2013, 4:23 pm - Clipper - Lottery Discussion Forum

Would you still play Mega Millions if your state lottery's jackpot was bigger?Reply
LottoGuyBC, focus on the larger jackpot That wouldn't necessarily be your best bet. Here's a post that might help you do the numbers to get a more precise read on the games RJOh mentioned above. It compares the straight Powerball with the Powerplay option. Using your state's odds numbers and the Megamillions ones, you can make the same comparisons to answer this Topic Question. Once you've done the work for all the smaller fixed prizes, all you have to do then for each draw is plug in
Feb 9, 2013, 2:28 pm - jimmy4164 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Lottery Systems ReviewReply
First note the name of the site: Lottery Systems Review Post with the same name as part of a sub domain on web.com In my opinion this site hopes to turn up in search results when Lottery Post is searched for. Beyond that, the only outgoing link on the site goes to an ad for the lottery guy on another sub domain site on a different host with a link to testimonials on the original lottery guy site on web.com When I bought this system back in 2004 for half what it sells for now, I no
Feb 9, 2013, 7:05 am - BobP - Lottery Systems Forum