Search

ForumsResults 37841 - 37850 of 43105 for odds. (0.77 seconds)

lexicographic clustering
possible combos of 5 with 49 numbers are 1,906,884 MATCH ODDS WINNING COMBOS 5/5 1 : 1906884 1 4/5 1 : 8668 220 3/5 1 : 202 9460 2/5 1 : 14 132440 1/5 1 : 3 678755 You might want to change that ~20 millions to ~2 millions
Jan 19, 2008, 5:15 pm - RJOh - Mathematics Forum

Your predictions and a large viewing of your post
We have two types of predictions here; the prediction pages where the results are analyzed and the standard 'one of these numbers should hit' in the other forums. When somebody says they have a system, I check their prediction statistics. Since the lotteries only payout 50 cents on the dollar, anyone over a 50% prize ratio is doing better than a random guess. To actually make money, a system would need over a 100% prize ratio but I wouldn't call that spectacular when the payoff odds on a 200% pr
Jan 18, 2008, 3:36 pm - Stack47 - Pick 5 Forum

lexicographic clustering
I look at total combinations, which can be expressed as a part of lex. For the 5/39- The largest amount of combinations contain the number 1. The second largest amount of cominations contain the number 2, and so on, leading to: The least amount of combinations contain the number 39. The combinations with low leading numbers appear to have odds favoring the lottery (such as 1-12-22-31-38). The combinations with high leading numbers appear to favor the player (such as 35-36-37-38
Jan 9, 2008, 1:19 pm - LottoFan - Mathematics Forum

Anybody Ever Win?
The guy who said getting 3 of 5 isn't close wasn't me. I was the guy who replied getting 4of5 means your odds dropped to 1 in 36 of getting all 5 correct because there are only 36 numbers from 5/40 remaining for the fifth position. What really counts is how many of the winning numbers were among those you played. If you had 3 of the winning numbers and won a 3# prize that's just a lucky break and nothing to get excited about. If on the other hand you are playing a reduced field and gettin
Jan 8, 2008, 1:47 pm - BobP - Pick 5 Forum

Anybody Ever Win?
Ok. So if I understand correctly. 1) Most people selling systems have never won....probably never even played You think Gail Howard has ever won? 2) Those who may have some sort of software/system are probably doing so well that they don't need to be bothered with public sales. Gee Bob P. I hope you are not right about your statement that someone who gets three out of five is not close...or on the right track . I mean just last night, I had three out of five in three separa
Jan 8, 2008, 12:01 pm - DownandDirty - Pick 5 Forum

Anybody Ever Win?
I would like to think that I have lowered my odds by playing this new system/method/plan (call it what you will). I have increased my winnings significantly.....thats a fact. Coincidence? I played a strategic quick pick system (believe it or not) for years as well and rarely won anything. Love to bore you with that silly strategy. Numbers repeat the next day and sometimes two days later...sometimes as much as 10-12 days later. You number crunchers are well aware of this and many other fu
Jan 7, 2008, 4:03 pm - DownandDirty - Pick 5 Forum

I'm in LOVE!!
Nothing special about any of the above mentioned wheels ...on the first look they seem great but its just another method...there are few good things and many bad things with these wheels...Don't kill me with your comments defending the wheels ....I mean if you love it that's cool with me ..use it to your advantage...Just posting my honest opinion...My observations on these wheels below... First of ...cutting a matrix of ~40 numbers (for pick 5) in half is terrible to begin with .. Next you
Jan 3, 2008, 2:59 am - benmas - Pick 5 Forum

For the sake of being blunt...
You said: As far as my method being flawless - it's the truth. I've said it before, my method produces 2-4 numbers for each set ( the 5 separate white balls). It's the Bonus ball numbers I have to work on. When I say it's flawless - it is in the fact that the winning number was among the 4 numbers. So, with my method, I'm dealing with 4 such numbers for each set and as I've explained and plead on some of my posts, I need someone to show me how to play all those numbers where each of those n
Dec 30, 2007, 5:39 pm - MADDOG10 - Lottery Systems Forum

For the sake of being blunt...
Of course from your perspective, you may see it that way, I don't. I can see if the fella is criticizing my method or how I look at patterns but it's neither. He insulted me personally. I can disagree with your system, method, or pattern but for me to call you, for ex., a b1tch for not agreeing with your insights would be unwarranted and your motives will come to surface. It's called, a Hater. As far as my method being flawless - it's the truth. I've said it before, my method produces 2-4 nu
Dec 30, 2007, 1:49 pm - NumbaTuff - Lottery Systems Forum

Tracking when Cash 3 triples fall
Theres really no way to tell for sure when a particular triple or other straight number (or group of numbers) is going to fall. I'm sure you know that each of the ten triples has an individual chance of 1 in 1000, which makes them hard to accurately predict. If you track ALL ten triples as a group, the odds become much shorter...down to 10 in 1000, which equates to 1 in 100 by fractional reduction. Now, if you want to try and anticipate the occurrence of any triple in general, then it m
Dec 27, 2007, 11:30 pm - Thoth - Lottery Systems Forum