Search

NY PlayersReply
Hi Mink404ski Jennilynn,NY midday was 648 I was hoping for 362 or 261. Using cold numbers that did not hit for the month of April I came up with the following numbers in a wheel for both midday and evening:973, 979, 993, 473,999, 479, 179,994, 174 261, 262, 221, 361 222 362. Thismethod only produces a few hits, but they do hit straight. I don't normally post predictions but when I say 479 hit straight I thought maybe this system would produce a few more hits , I am going to watch and s
May 10, 2003, 5:20 pm - Phyllis - Pick 3 Forum

BasicsReply
The reason I started coming here was to see if there was a way to get an advantage. I am just questioning your statements. The Pick 3 mechanics are minimized just like the bigger games. Even a slight mechanical bias would not reduce the odds enough to make a difference. Especially in the bigger games. Even if you were able to reduce the powerball odds to half, you still would have to come up with 60 million bucks to take advantage of it. How much are the odds reduced using your system?
May 3, 2003, 1:22 pm - Thomas Covenant - Lottery Discussion Forum

Do lottery systems really work?Reply
Hopefully someday someone at this forum will win a big jackpot and the bragging rights on how to pick a winning combination. In the Ohio649P lottery I noticed that 58% of the winnings combinations were within perimeters that covered 55% of the 13,983,816 possible combinations, it that kind of edge that the system player is looking for to increase his chance of a win. With the payout at the lower level, even if a player beats the odds he will lose money unless he wins the jackpot. For example
Apr 24, 2003, 4:40 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

FloridaReply
Lobster,The PICK 3 Art of Selection Tool uses only the previous 3 drawings to predict numbers. In addition to numbers it also defines the potential sum range.Example yesterday the sum range was 8 to 20. 900 fit into that range. It combines singles, doubles and triples. But if you are interested in doubles in particular it can also separate them. In case of middle ranges I compress the numbers by expecting at least one high (in my system 5-9) or one low number (0-4) in every selection.For yesterd
Apr 21, 2003, 1:24 pm - everett - Pick 3 Forum

Challenge to Fellow LotteryPost Friends!!Reply
First Challenge thought:If a 6/49 games would be played (probably one of the oldest lottery games around) the suggestion of 5 or 10 tickets would not be enough to see anything about a system.If you are trying to evaluate the quality of different systems, programs or other tools, that would require to pick a sample that would have some statistical significance. 25 to 100 tickets in a 5 or 10 draw run would be a reasonable sample. Statistically to can expect one to two 3 number hits during that pe
Mar 19, 2003, 9:00 pm - everett - Lottery Discussion Forum

Whats to be learned?Reply
To RJohYour example about 6/49 makes sense. Trying to mach 3 to get $50 is a good plan.I will just suggest that if you want to play 10 combinaisons, don't play randomly. Instead, play a selection of 10 numbers. Finding 3 within 10, gives you some excellent odds. Better that finding 3 within 6 X 10 combinaisons.The way to achieve that, is to use a system. The best one you can get for a selection of 10 numbers will give you 10 combinaisons to play with the guarantee that is you match 3 within you
Feb 3, 2003, 6:19 pm - lostinwebspace - Lottery Discussion Forum

Holy Grail
Hello Forum players,In my desire to predict the winning numbers for the pick 3. I have often wondered who may have the perfect system. A system which could filter the playable numbers to such a few that it would be affordable for a person to win insanely large sums of money. I am ot talking about $5000, $50,000 or even $500,000. I am talking about winning the maximum the lottery officials will allow.....$8,000,000.I must admit if it were possible, I am sure the officials would quickly change
Dec 18, 2002, 11:46 am - mrscottia - Pick 3 Forum

where are you cheetah ??Reply
Quote: Originally posted by visiondude on December 13, 2002cheetah, anybody who is or might be interested in purchasing your system (lottery software) is only interested in one thing. that you can help them put more money in their pockets than they can do for themselves. not many people in here care about stats . stats can deceive and confuse people making them think that you can do something that they cannot do for themselves.i have cut thru all the spin and am representing the real world
Dec 13, 2002, 7:19 pm - lottocheatah - Pick 5 Forum

N.J,GA & Oh Mid.&Eve. 09/25/2002Reply
Hello Lucky,question for you, do you use sum analysis to get your predictions? I use sum analysis with the most probable pair totals plus the highest (in most cases) total in conjunction with the single digit sums that add up to the full total of each number. As you probably know, this system is quite iffy and the only comparison that I have noted is that wether I use 6, 10, 20 or 30 days, even up to a year as a back winning number data base, the pick 3 in Ohio, is a real bugger. After two or
Sep 25, 2002, 7:01 am - Teufellj - Pick 3 Forum

pick 3 systems by steve playerReply
Hi Linda...thanks for the reply...Ive been following steve since early 1980 when he 1st published a tiny manual called WIN for ny daily #`s game..he`s hard to figure out..what I mean is some of his systems are really helpful and legit and someothers are absolute junk...I have is lucky 7 system, daily tracer, numbers cruncher just to name a few..these are extremely helpful..i am on his mailing list and he keeps me updated on new systems..a friend of mine in ga. bought his master cash red list sys
Sep 21, 2002, 9:23 am - topguntom2 - Pick 3 Forum