Search

Lucky Lotto Picks System by "Pete Egeler"Reply
Whoa stack, you kinda took off in a whole other direction with this post, lol. I liked your previous post. If you think about it, I am not complianing about Pete's system, I am disscussing it, ya know. I am not stranger to making money with gambling games. I am also no stranger to the internet, or posting on forums, but this is my first real exposure to a group of people who think that they can make a profit playing the family of games that offer the worst odds on planet earth (lottery).
Nov 13, 2007, 7:21 pm - Summertime - Lottery Systems Forum

Pairs for four digit gamesReply
Hey winsum- Your response was welcomed- Really apperciated your honest efforts on my behalf Looks like I was remiss by not saying this concept, was concieved for live parlor casino Keno and or Video Keno where the pair odds are fixed by the house or machine. Your State keno results are sincere enough but, unfortuanely, not applicable because ot their other inherant variable factors. Nothing spectacular mind you, but I have had some modest but measurable success with gaming that i
Nov 8, 2007, 6:10 pm - eddessaknight - Lottery Systems Forum

I smell something in S.C. 3Reply
heres another one The low odds [1 3] are the longest out ev-od/hi-lo group in position one. last seen here. October18, 2007 [ Evening ] 3 1 1 October19, 2007 [ Midday ] 1 4 1 October19, 2007 [ Evening ] 4 0 8 October20, 2007 [ Midday ] 8 3 6 October20, 2007 [ Evening ] 0 7 5 October21, 2007 [ Evening ] 1 2 2 October22, 2007 [ Midday ] 4 2 9
Nov 1, 2007, 9:52 pm - JAP69 - Pick 3 Forum

Indiana lottery players still hunting year-old jackpotReply
Your remarks are somewhat puzzling -- maybe it's just me. If you were to refer back to the news story posted on the 17th (Hoosier Lotto in a dry spell), you would notice the following quote: The probability of no jackpot winner for such a long time is incredibly small, said Steve McKinley, a probability lecturer at Indiana University. He estimated the odds of no winner for 51 straight weeks to be a fraction of a percent. Now, that's a probabilities lecturer from Indiana University sa
Oct 31, 2007, 5:49 pm - Todd - Lottery News

Lucky Lotto Picks System by "Pete Egeler"Reply
Fair is fair, I'll tell the whole story. OK folks heres the deal, I emailed Pete and asked him if he would trade me his system for investment information I have that is worth far more than $27. Pete declined my offer in favor of hoping I'd pay him $27 instead. He cited (in so many words) that he makes his money selling the system, not playing the lottery, and that selling ebooks online (like lottery systems) is the way to make money off of people, not playing the lottery, or actually playing a s
Oct 30, 2007, 3:22 pm - Summertime - Lottery Systems Forum

Most don't play enough numbers to profit at Pick 3 !Reply
Win D It says Think of it in these terms. It was demonstation ..... Vegas saying: You bet your mind you lose your mind. Not all the lurkers and others here will have seen the think in these terms aspect Storybook indeed, as in Once upon a time I read if you played more numbers you'd win! So I went to the bank and ...... A long time ago there was a discussion on 5 /30 games and someone said with odds that low they'd borrow the money, play all the combos, and guarantee
Oct 23, 2007, 10:24 am - Coin Toss - Lottery Discussion Forum

Most don't play enough numbers to profit at Pick 3 !Reply
I done some research and exact order wheeling for the pick 4 which I posted today. If I wanted to add more numbers to the list by adding the low evens in position 4 which are the 024 there would have been a winner there. I chose only the high odds in position 4. 0882 came out tonights eve draw. Now we are talking $2,500.00 for a $.50 cent bet. 1665 1667 1669 1885 1887 1889 1685 1687 1689 1865 1867 1869 3665 3667 3669 3885 3887 3889 3685 3687 3689 3865 3867 3869 2665 2667 2669
Oct 22, 2007, 8:03 pm - JAP69 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Advanced Lotto ToolReply
The program is from europe hard to say when if ever the help file will be translated. 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 would be no consecutive numbers, 2 1 1 1 1 would be 2 consecutive, 3-2-1 would be two and three like 22-23-34-35-36-45 2. range between the lowest and highest numbers you expect to be drawn 01-36, 07-42, 14-49 that kind of thing. 3. number of times the same first or last digit appears. 2-1-1-1-1 would be like 22-23 or 22-32 4. Sum of digits is what you get when you add up all the d
Oct 19, 2007, 3:03 am - BobP - Lottery Systems Forum

How many 50/50 filters do we need?Reply
They make those odds pretty tough to play .....and still have a fair shot don't they? I'm not even sure I know 7 50/50 filters ! 1. Mostly to All ODD/Evens 2. Mostly to All High/LOw 3. Mostly IN/OUT digits 01289 34567 4. ?? etc. Let's try to think of some more 50/50 filters Maybe all numbers star
Oct 17, 2007, 1:51 pm - WIN D - Lottery Systems Forum

any thoughts please
Hi there, I'm a regular lottery player in the uk, and I play the same 7 lines for the uk lottery twice a week. Yesterday something strange happened and I'm hoping that I can get some feedback on here about it. My partner works in a pub, he was working last night and when I picked him up in the early hours he gave me a completed lottery slip that he had found outside the pub and said I wonder if this person won? the actual ticket was missing though. So I had a look at the numbers
Oct 7, 2007, 3:09 pm - leighby - Lottery Discussion Forum