Search

Missing LP MembersReply
I'd like to know which Canadian site it is that Lotto$Master was referring to, if there is a good one. ...As for the absentee LP members, they probably got sick and tired of throwing away too much good money at numerous ideas without a clear, coherent, chronological, step-by-step, ordered methodical strategy to follow for every draw, plus the fact that no one should even play every single draw based on wishy-washy gut feelings no matter what medication you're on :)! I like to
Nov 12, 2006, 5:18 pm - LottoHackJack - Lottery Discussion Forum

New System... No Brain Required!!Reply
New Results!! I tried something else with this system, using the 3,8,9 concept that cps suggested. Great idea!! Cuts the numbers in half. Ok... evens using the 3,8,9 concept gives us these numbers... 018 028 148 248 268 048 068 128 168 468 Oct. Nov. 93 box 17 str. 23 box 2 str. Odds using the 3,8,9 concept 013 035 039 079 135 137 179 357 359 379 579 Oct. Nov. 136 box 23 str. 3
Nov 10, 2006, 2:44 am - Surge - Lottery Systems Forum

20% chance of winning, still play?Reply
Alright let me say another way. You all are talking about change then why did everyone vote the way they did. WE put the same old hack kneed ideas back in again only with a different name on it, its called Democrat. I guess I do not understand how you folks define change. Is change doing the same thing over and over and over again for the last 60 years and expecting different results. That not change thats the defination of pure insanity. I am involved in grass roots politics at the co
Nov 9, 2006, 9:19 pm - floridian - Lottery Discussion Forum

7-11 System "They" system beats ONLINEReply
Oh! did the Dems have a victory. I thought both these parties are promising the same old stuff they have been promising for the last 60 years, The victory is for personal greed and power. If you think differenct you are leading a sheltered life. I quit the juvenile game show of party politics years ago. As all you Lottery System people are so quick to point out the odds just are not there. Its doomed to fail. Good God look at where we are and how we got here. Look guys and gals if an
Nov 8, 2006, 12:46 pm - floridian - Lottery Systems Forum

Probability of a MegaMillions rollover.Reply
I use what is called a Poisson distribution, assuming that all purchases are effectively random. When the number of tickets purchased is very small compared to the odds, a Poisson distribution will give numbers that are close to the numbers obtained by dividing the number of tickets purchased by the probability. However as the number of tickets purchased increases, there is a greater probability that each new purchaser will purchase a ticket with a set of numbers that has been already purch
Nov 4, 2006, 1:41 pm - Prob988 - Jackpot Games Forum

Within 6 draws Delaware.til 11/3
024, 026, 029, 038, 047, 049, 056, 058, 067, 069, 078, 089, 128, 146, 148, 168, 236, 238, 245, 247, 249, 256, 258, 267, 269, 278, 346, 348, 368, 456, 458, 467 002, 004, 006, 008, 220, 224, 227, 229, 440, 443, 445, 447, 449, 661, 663, 665, 668, 881, 884, 886 222, 888 ******************************* All EVENS DUE also watch the law of opposites all odds 8-4-2-6 PCN FILTER 029, 038, 049, 058, 069, 078, 089, 128, 148, 168, 236, 238, , 249, 258, 269, 278, 346, 348, 368, 4
Nov 1, 2006, 1:10 pm - Blackapple - Pick 3 Forum

MegaMillions and Quick Pick
With megamillions controling 70% of the numbers waged upon...it is only fitting that the majority of the grand prize winners be from quick picks. We should not assume that MM quickpick system controls the variety of combinations given out thus allowing them more control of the quantity of grand prize winners. If you give out 70% of the tickets bought, then expect to see the major winners from that group of 70%. As smart as the players here on LotteryPost are your systems will never produce a
Nov 1, 2006, 10:17 am - Shane3 - Jackpot Games Forum

Personal NumbersReply
1. I'm not sure what your response is supposed to mean. I haven't seen any bias, but it's certain to exist. The only question is how much bias there is. I'd be surprised if any of the balls were more than 1 or 2% different than the average. 2. I don't use a system by any reasonable definition. Again I ask *why* do you need a system, and what is its purpose? Is it to make you feel good about the numbers that you'll probably lose with, is it to help you pass the time, or is it supposed to give
Oct 31, 2006, 6:28 pm - KY Floyd - Jackpot Games Forum

New PA Game - Mix And MatchReply
I'm back. due to computer problems, and the Web Marshall I strayed away. but had to see what was happening expecialy with the Mix and Match. When I last left, Match 6 was just getting started. It seemed that Ohio was deciding a new game, which would have been like Match 6, or a straight pick six lotto game with better odds and hit rates. Turned out they coame up with something really different, a bingo type game where order does matter. Go figure. Agree, PA does come up with
Oct 30, 2006, 1:35 pm - Lotto Czar - Jackpot Games Forum

$45 million Calif. SuperLotto winner claims jackpotNews Story
The holder of a $45 million California SuperLotto Plus ticket, which was purchased at a Calabasas Shell station, came forward Monday, lottery officials said. Lee Jarrett claimed the jackpot, saying he just realized that he was holding the winning ticket from last Wednesday's drawing. I checked the Lottery's Web site around 3 a.m. and then I just stared at the ticket for 20 to 30 minutes, making sure I had the right draw date and that all the numbers really matched and that I wasn't imagin
Oct 24, 2006, 10:27 am - Todd - Lottery News