Search

New York: 9/1 - 9/30/2018Reply
Try looking at it with the color it makes the odds and evens stand out. I like EEOO but we could see a repeat of EEEO MID 9/24/18 P1. P2 . P3 . P4 0. 1 . 0. 2 2. 6. 3. 5 6. 7. 7. 6 8. 8. 9 . 8 EVE 9/24/18 P1. P2. P3 . P4 2. 0 . 4. 2 5. 4. 7. 3 7. 5. 8 . 4 8. 6. 9. 9
Sep 23, 2018, 10:04 pm - Lex113 - Pick 4 Forum

Megamillions $303 millionReply
From that same Forbes link; Most probability professionals will agree that you can t game a fair system. They scoff at any kind of scheme that promises better odds of winning a fair game with a random drawing, as each number has its own equal chance of being drawn each time. This should be a mantra for those seeking system. music, I'm not saying don't play just that players should realize what they're up against. I'd love to see an interview like this during the next jackpot feve
Sep 23, 2018, 12:04 am - Coin Toss - Lottery Discussion Forum

Cycles - Interesting NumbersReply
FYI just a performance update. All my last lot of modelling has come up with 6 numbers correct from a pool of between 18 to 22 numbers instead of 45. So I have essentially cut in half the selection range of numbers to come up with the 6 winning numbers in EVERY game. This is an improvement against what was roughly every 8 to 12th game. Next step is to improve on the total number of numbers, trying to reduce the pool of 22 numbers down to 18 or less consistently while maintaining the
Sep 18, 2018, 12:17 am - Hydromaln7 - Lottery Discussion Forum

The problem with systemsReply
Tucker Black What you say about math and luck is probably true, but there are exceptions. If you create and use a system that tracks 'trends.' in lieu of math, you see a lottery game in a different light. Yes, it's still random, but, it's amazing what you can find when you use random as a sort of prediction tool. I have tracking schemes that do just that. All I have to do is evaluate the short term trends and make correct choices = no math required. A shame that so many lottery
Sep 7, 2018, 10:51 pm - bobby623 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Cycles - Interesting NumbersReply
Thanks BobP, Odds are meant to be broken No they are not the most repeated numbers, been down that road and can calculate that easily enough. But even if you played the most popular 22 from 45 it would not give you the winning number hit rate or frequency that I seem to be achieving at the moment. Still running this in a modeling mode to double check all my data inputs and ensure no outcome contamination to the results. Blind testing against historical data sets for various game type
Sep 7, 2018, 5:38 am - Hydromaln7 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Trough Root sum Master and the absence of 01 & 89 pairReply
by 8/26 Tennessee Absence Even Vtrac Due Root Sums: 1 8326 8830 0856 0316 0721 0811 0325 0370 5716 8317 5815 5356 6337 8335 3 0867 5826 0516 0831 6321 0327 0336 5817 6717 5367 5835 8337 6 0816 0366 0825 0870 0321 8817 6837 8835 8727 5316 5721 5811 6711 8331 0357 5325 8 6821 8810 0836 6326 0827 0521 0710 8837 5831 6317 5516 8711 5327 0377 5336 How do I reduce the picks? All evens and all odds are a long shot We all agree Triads 036x 086x 158x 3
Aug 24, 2018, 9:35 am - Blackapple - Lottery Systems Forum

The problem with systemsReply
BRIEFLY: Understand that the bottom line is what drives all gambling venues. Management doesn't care a hoot what you are doing as long as you're losing as per expectation Now if you just happen to be over coming the losing hand and or the odds and even if wearing a halo, things change- The monitoring pit boss see a drop in the table drop asks hey what's going wrong with this game? Player is suppose to lose so he is video taped identified and if found to be an advantage player then a nu
Aug 20, 2018, 8:12 pm - eddessaknight - Lottery Discussion Forum

The problem with systemsReply
Amber Seems you have tied yourself into a knot! Might I suggest the following? 1. Forget everything you think you have learned about lottery game analysis. 2. Step back and observe some actual lottery drawings. 3. Accept the fact that the lottery balls are objects and have no mathematical value. 4. Adjust your beliefs and realize that drawings, including the pre- and post-tests, are individual events. In other words, the first pretest drawing stands alone and has no effect/affe
Aug 20, 2018, 8:20 am - bobby623 - Lottery Discussion Forum

What are the bases of an algorithm for discovering patterns of a lotteryReply
Okay, I'll go ahead and post it one more time just to establish that there has been and still is much more proof out there on a certain approach to win ANY lottery game... period. https://www.thelottolife.com/blog/2015/2/23/strategies-how-these-mit-maths-whizzkids-managed-to-win-a-wh.html *Those MIT mathematicians pushed odds, probability, statistics, and percentages to win that game many times over and, ultimately, caused it to be DISCONTINUED. Now, let's go and have a quick look at
Jul 12, 2018, 7:59 pm - Lucky Loser - Lottery Discussion Forum

What are the bases of an algorithm for discovering patterns of a lotteryReply
Amen! There are many patterns in the drawing history for any lottery game. Problems is that they don't stand and hit you in nose. You have to find them. I've discovered that the best way to expose noteworthy patterns is to generate tracking charts that reveal events and features not readily apparent when you evaluate the activity of 70 dead as dirt objects in a single vessel. I use the power of substitution to the fullest extent possible. The only problem is that my 'educ
Jul 12, 2018, 6:26 pm - bobby623 - Lottery Discussion Forum