- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 5:28 pm
You last visited
June 12, 2026, 8:32 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Search
Search the Lottery Post forums for the keyword(s) you specify
Observations Virginia Cash5: YOu Could make $600,000 a year...
take the last number of a combination is usually from: 25-35 [10 numbers] let:
25 and 26 = 1
27 and 28 = 2
29 and 30 = 3
31 and 32 = 4
33 and 34 = 5
forget 35...
you guess which one it will be, which one it will play: then you count 19-22 numbers backwards and it should be/give you the first number of the winning combination....So now you have the first number and the last number [20 spread]...Just got to guess the 3 numbers in the middle...Play 50 cents and you win: $50,000
Sep 8, 2010, 1:23 am - pumpi76 - Pick 5 Forum
Vt. Lottery computer glitch creates extra winners
Just to keep the facts straight here is what the article said:
Linda Hebert says she didn't think twice when she purchased two nearly identical computer-generated Fast Play tickets...
According to the VT lottery website, this is a Fast Play.
Vermont Lottery -- It's good clean fun!:
http://www.vtlottery.com/allgames/fastplay.aspx
Vermont Lottery Fast Play Games
Fast Play games are generated by the lottery machine but play like an instant game.
Every few months the Verm
Sep 2, 2010, 12:14 am - truecritic - Lottery News
Fooled by Randomness
8/28/10:
All your data is based on making the same bet in every drawing and you're trying to show that making those types of bets can't win in the long run. But it's old news because one only has to look at the long term probability of the same thing happening to know what's a bad bet.
8/30/10:
You just repeated what I said only worded it differently; I know making the same bet on the same number for 33.5 or 67 years is a bad bet as is making the same bet on 2, 10, or 100 numbers. Tell
Aug 31, 2010, 1:00 am - Stack47 - Lottery Systems Forum
Mega Millions lottery ticket worth $133M sold in Calif.
Morro Bay liquor store to get $665,000 commission
A $133 million lottery jackpot is more than the stuff of daydreams for one customer of a Morro Bay, California, liquor store.
Bottle Liquor and Deli at 999 Main St. in Morro Bay sold the winning Mega Millions lottery ticket, the only jackpot winner in Friday's 41-state drawing, according to the California Lottery.
The winning numbers: 4-10-26-32-41 and Mega 31.
The odds of winning a Mega Millions jackpot, according to the lottery: 1 i
Aug 30, 2010, 8:54 am - Todd - Lottery News
Washington Lottery prizes in search of owners
Every year, $9 million in Washington Lottery winnings go unclaimed.
Case in point: Someone bought a Mega Millions ticket earlier this month at a 7-Eleven on North 36th Street in Seattle's Fremont neighborhood but has yet to collect the $250,000 in prize money that goes with it.
Right now there's about $400,000 in prize money that can still be claimed before the deadlines imposed by the state are reached. A winner has 180 days from the date of a drawing to collect winnings.
A prize of $1
Aug 30, 2010, 8:09 am - Todd - Lottery News
Lets Dream
jwhou,
So where were you when I needed you during my pummeling in my Fooled By Randomness thread in Lottery Systems? Your post above and its immediate predecessor provide enough insight [for me] to feel even more secure in my belief that most lottery machines and algorithms are sufficiently random for their assigned task. I too have worked with several types of RNGs while doing OS simulations and some not too critical database encryptions. I found the basic linear conguential generator invalu
Aug 25, 2010, 1:36 am - jimmy4164 - Lottery Discussion Forum
Lets Dream
Interesting.
You may not be aware of it but reducing the numbers down to even or odd is essentially the mathematical operation modulus (represented by the % symbol), basically you're taking the modulus 2 of the number (though a modulus 2 would render even numbers to be 0 and odd numbers to be 1). By taking the modulus 2 of three numbers to come up with three binary values, you're classifying them to 8 possibilities, by summing them, you are classifying them into four categories, two of which
Aug 24, 2010, 7:11 pm - jwhou - Lottery Discussion Forum
Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP's
i go hunting down people who believe the opposite of what i do.
your a disgusting human being.
i never said those exact words, and you either took what said and chopped it up into making it look like that's what i said, or extracted it out of context.
i don't do that. never have. never will, and there is no way i ever contextually said that.
you are one twisted dude.
****************************************************************************************
anyone that sali
Aug 21, 2010, 5:33 pm - visiondude - Lottery Discussion Forum
Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP's
After some discussion in your thread, here's is what I think about your question.
I think your math as you stated it, is correct. QPs are defined by the Lottery Commission. They are the tickets you purchase which are printed quick pick or similar language. However, the lottery doesn't track SPs. They only define SPs as anything other than a QP. That is where the major difference of opinion comes up. If someone plays dreams or license plates, it is based on some random event. It isn't a QP. B
Aug 20, 2010, 9:59 pm - truecritic - Lottery Discussion Forum
Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP's
you bet what men wrote .
......because it's a lame excuse that it isn't valid because men wrote it thousands of years ago.
if you were to hold to that as a valid excuse , you would have to imply the same integrity de-validation process and disregard every single thing ever written from 2 seconds ago backwards - all the way back to the beginnning of history.
you couldn't trust your own geneaology because of illiterate people in your family tree
you cannot live a truthful life, and ex
Aug 19, 2010, 2:12 am - visiondude - Lottery Discussion Forum
