Search

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
you bet what men wrote . ......because it's a lame excuse that it isn't valid because men wrote it thousands of years ago. if you were to hold to that as a valid excuse , you would have to imply the same integrity de-validation process and disregard every single thing ever written from 2 seconds ago backwards - all the way back to the beginnning of history. you couldn't trust your own geneaology because of illiterate people in your family tree you cannot live a truthful life, and ex
Aug 19, 2010, 2:12 am - visiondude - Lottery Discussion Forum

Man wins Fla. Lottery jackpot for 7th timeReply
I'm done talling about Lustig's system Pick any numbers and play 10 cards and never change your numbers. If that's a system than use it, but I learned nothing from the booklet. I've been playing for many years, using my system that involves having 300 Fantasy cards filled with my numbers. I'll pull out 5 to 10 cards at random and play them a couple times a week. I'll hit many 4 of 5's and when it's a rolldown I get $555.00. A while back the rpize would be over $1000 for a 4 out of 5, and I had t
Aug 18, 2010, 6:28 pm - skeptic - Lottery News

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
whoever it was that you jacked your excuse from, you need to get his email address, because you are going to need his help (seeing how you originally couldn't debunk it yourself). you can apologize to the board in advance, for unnessarily causing this thread to go down an unrelated road. i sure don't mind taking the time it takes to defend my claims, but you pull this stuff at LP all the time unnecessarily. i will come back later tonight and easily handle what you thought was an excuse.
Aug 18, 2010, 4:52 pm - visiondude - Lottery Discussion Forum

One of the Most Powerful System, EVER for Pick4 thanks to: Stack47Reply
Pumpi, The probability is at least 1 two digit combination will hit in 99.9% of all pick-4 drawings and at least 1 three digit combo in 91% of all drawings so you may consider the box bet. Granted there are 45 two digit combos but if you use 5 two digit combos using all 10 digits, the odds of one of them being drawn is less than 9 to 1. Your example of A through E uses consecutive digits and you could play them with any other type of two digit combo; A2 = 1-6, B2 = 2-7, C2 = 3-8, D2 = 4-9,
Aug 16, 2010, 12:08 am - Stack47 - Lottery Systems Forum

Fooled by RandomnessReply
RL, I thought we were talking about a Pick-3 lottery, so I will continue to assume that here. I will also assume that when you say a pattern being drawn what you mean is a number which is a member of a SET of numbers DERIVED from a pattern. 1000 / 64 equals 15.625, which I will round up to 16. It's easy to construct 64 sets of 3 digit numbers. I don't really care how you do it. If you want or need exactly 64 sets, they will not all contain 16 members, but that is of no consequence.
Aug 12, 2010, 12:27 pm - jimmy4164 - Lottery Systems Forum

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
A few QP'rs here are the biggest mouths. What do they have to defend by challenging systematic play? A BIG LAZY LOSER EGO with lots of time on their hands we are defending the real truth about the pursuit of the lottery, and the integrity factor as to WHAT'S TRULY POSSIBLE......vs what's claimed . and ......when guys like you state QP's are a waste of time, and that systems can grant a player a statistical edge, then you (and whoever else makes that assertion) gets the spotlight tu
Aug 11, 2010, 1:26 am - visiondude - Lottery Discussion Forum

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
(I'm quite sure no one thinks you look good in this forum) even if that is true, it's not like that is going to dissuade me from what i KNOW is right. i don't live for popularity, and if you do, that's your social expenditure. integrity means even if you are the only one in the entire room... like i stated, resorting to calling people names is classless, and demonstrates a weak position because you cannot seperate people from beliefs , etc. calling people names is nothing more than a
Aug 10, 2010, 4:53 pm - visiondude - Lottery Discussion Forum

Billylocos' MLB picks for August 2010Reply
TIGGS!! u make me laugh!! Actually I am hitting soccer for BIG $$$ (altho i stunk in World Cup) I give to Catholic Charities weekly and a goodly amount. Outside of that I am a frugal individual I bought GOLD when it was $390 an oz. in 83, so my $4 oz are worth alot more a/o yesterday, it just make me sick that I did not keep investing in it, but Corvettes and speed boats were my weaknesses back then..LOL!!! On the 1 1/2 rl it means the team has to just win by 2 or more., theres an e
Aug 6, 2010, 11:17 am - billyloco - Gaming Forum

Statistically Speaking - QP's and PP'sReply
Curiousity got the best of me again, so I checked the results for Tx Lotto going back to the last matrix change on 4-26-06. There are 2 draws a week. There have been 29 jackpot winners, 19 QP's, 10 SP's. Then I checked Tx 2 Step which is drawn 2 times a week. I only went back to the beginning of this year for time's sake. There have been 17 jackpot winners. 13 QP's, 4 SP's. Then I checked Cash 5 which is a daily game. Going back the beginning of this year, there have been 101 jackpot winne
Aug 6, 2010, 9:34 am - rcbbuckeye - Lottery Discussion Forum

My digit system for pick-5 or pick-6 lotteryReply
Unbelievable! So, then, are you telling me that you don't believe the Gambler's Fallacy is really a fallacy? If your answer is yes, then that explains why you believe that some things occure more often then others and why you're baffled that I don't agree with you. Furthermore, what have I said at this site that gives you the impression that I want the lottery to go away? If you check, you'll find I'm on record on several occassions declaring that I play the lottery and feel the money I spend
Jul 26, 2010, 4:16 am - jimmy4164 - Lottery Systems Forum