Search

Testing a Lottery programReply
that's why the so called predictors in here gravitate toward the pick 3. because of the short odds they are bound to hit if they throw out enough numbers. that is how they make their money. a supposed hit here or there gives them credibility. that's when people start lining up to buy their systems . haven't seen anyone take my challenge yet? if you really have a system , quit fooling around with the little combinations. let's see what you really have - predict the big one ! it continues to
Jul 19, 2002, 9:58 am - visiondude - Lottery Discussion Forum

Play Pick3 Software!!! Greattttttt!!!!
Sorry for the delay. For all of the people who wrote me. I got tons of email responses for my comment about Todds Play Pick 3 program. Everyone wants to know what data I used and how much history. It is very hard to believe, but I only typed in one number. I put the midday number in and I got the evening number STRAIGHT!!! It happend twice already. I just type todays' number in and hit predict and then I delete it! I'm waiting for the fully blown registerd version which should be here by the end
Jul 15, 2002, 10:55 pm - TheGreenSage - Lottery Discussion Forum

Why is Steve Player the only one with the COURAGE to post hiReply
Glen sounds to me like you are trying to hard, especially if your starting to let your emotions take over. Try taking a break, we sometimes read to much into systems, and we often try to hard, remember just because they draw every week doesn't mean we half to play. One thing I would like to share with you is, when you were bashing the smaller games, Ask your self this, if you can not hit the the small game like the pick 3, how can you expect to work a system that will hit the big ones. We half t
Jun 11, 2002, 7:22 am - mark - Lottery Discussion Forum

Why is Steve Player the only one with the COURAGE to post hiReply
Glenn, weren't you the one who asked for the web address of the One to Won site a couple weeks ago? You sure haven't tested any of their systems to any degree. I imagine the rest have been tested only a few times also. If you track the Pick 3 Fairy for a month versus Steve Player's numbers for a month in any of his systems, I bet they would come close on wins. And hers are free. Shame on you for saying the predictors on the various boards aren't any good. They are good...but you need to track fo
Jun 8, 2002, 5:33 am - Sandy K - Lottery Discussion Forum

Why is Steve Player the only one with the COURAGE to post hiReply
Glenn,As you know, I don't have a Pick-5 or Pick-6 System yet. Even though I have the algorithms etc. commited to paper for these games. No attempt has been made to program them. Only by having the ability to back-test my system on the computer, could I say with any certainty that my system algorithms work.Will my Pick-5 and Pick-6 algorithms, once programmed, really work? The immediate answer would have to be yes. But at what cost?If you want a 60% assurance of winning (odds), then you will hav
Jun 7, 2002, 6:56 pm - Sedertree - Lottery Discussion Forum

Why "patterns" and "systems" CANNOT win!Reply
If patterns and systems cannot win, then why do insurance companies use them?Why do major stock and commodity brokers use them ? These people rely on patterns, and statistics. Statistics are nothing more then information gathered on any particuliar subject for the purpose of determining what may happen in the future. Isn't that a system? Almost every major business relies on this information to determine there future plans. Your challenge may sound justified to you, but it does not disclose the
May 19, 2002, 10:32 pm - mark - Lottery Discussion Forum

Its all Basic MathReply
If it is just basic math, then the system should be good for all states, your first posting stated it was good in Ga,S.C. and Florida.Then you posted in a reply to degeem that Il was staggered ,and then you went on to add a few more states it was good in.But if a system was just basic math, it should be good in all states.South Carolina, would be a exception because it is the newest member to lottery, and is just now getting enough draws to start determining basic math principles.Sorry Akbar, bu
Apr 7, 2002, 7:44 am - mark - Lottery Discussion Forum

Test Game: Mass Millions 12/20/2001 Odds 1 in 4Reply
I was going to post this along with the numbers, but I messed up..Theres a few things you should watch for. The first is the actual numbers that I post. These numbers will change every draw. This is based on the statistical probability that the numbers drawn in the last game will not be repeated in the next. I remove these numbers during the process of selection. The numbers I pick are based on a system that I won't get into. However, the chance of these numbers showing up are greater than 50%.
Dec 20, 2001, 4:20 pm - luckyone - Lottery Discussion Forum

HELP!!Reply
Hi Skony,It could very well affect Ohio and other states, too. It all depends on what's hitting. I usually take the last number that hit in a drawing, find it on the board I'm working with at that time, and try to pull another number from that area. It's kind of hard to explain because there are other factors I consider, too when trying to pick. For example, I notice stuff like 6s and 9s falling together in drawings, which to me is a sign that a triple is in the making. A lot of times, when
Nov 8, 2001, 6:07 pm - Sista Dee - Lottery Discussion Forum

Numbers to eliminate for Big Game drawing 11-02-01:Reply
Hello Lottoscorp,If you have read some of my other posting in this form, then you know I am not a winning lottery player. I have matched some numbers for a $5 to $10 payback once in a while, but I have never won the jackpot or 2nd prize. I have posted the numbers I've have played for the Biggame and done no better than the others that posted. I have posted how and why I picked the numbers I posted. When I comment on a system, I'm not putting down the system, I just wondering if it is bettering t
Nov 5, 2001, 8:24 am - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum