Search

120 (6 way) Quads ChartReply
Looks like odds and evens are separated and highs and lows. Used for trapping. ie: some people see a 1 in 2 dvent occur 7 days, 5 days, 6 days, etc. in a row. Lets say the following 7 combos are drawn:1) 5342) 9143) 0914) 1835) 2756) 3927) 671Now you see, the (almost) 1 in 2 dvent that occured 7 times in a row was the Odd Odd Even sequence. That was a little less than 1 in 128 dvent that occured. If it were actually fifty fifty then it would be a 1 in 128. The reason why I say it's less than
Jun 10, 2004, 4:32 am - QWEST46 - Lottery Systems Forum

PREDICTIONS: Need your feedbackReply
Quote: Originally posted by BobP on May 27, 2004You really surprise me RJOh: The best way to have the winning numbers among the numbers you are playing is to play them all. With 100 lines in a Pick-6/49 game playing all the numbers I can get about 95% coverage of a 3if6 guarantee and that's before arranging the numbers within the combinations to eliminate unlikely draws. With 163 lines I can 100% guarantee at least a 3# prize every time. Ken Silver's system takes 120 lines according to the a
May 27, 2004, 4:19 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

A Modest ProposalReply
Quote: Originally posted by Colin F on May 23, 2004Quote: Originally posted by rdarmand on May 22, 2004Quote: Originally posted by Colin F on May 22, 2004Let's up the ante a bit. Our new variation of coin tossing requres you to bet on the results of the next 6 tosses. So your ticket will be something like HTHTHH. rdArmand are you going to bet HHHHHH, TTTTTT or something elseColinI'm not sure I understand the thrust of your question.rdarmandYou do. Answer the question.Geez, Colin, you don't have
May 23, 2004, 4:45 am - rdarmand - Lottery Systems Forum

Numerology & Powerball IReply
Quote: Originally posted by hypersoniq on May 22, 2004Quote: Originally posted by Colin F on May 22, 2004 those who are successful in this field.name one...hypersoniqI've defined what I regard as successful in this field on a number of Posts. If you can consistently get better than the published odds then you're successful in my opinion ie you've beat the odds. BobP's 164 lines satisfy that criteria. I call them BobP's lines but as he points out that approach apparently started with Gail Howard.
May 22, 2004, 11:23 pm - Colin F - Lottery Systems Forum

A Modest ProposalReply
Quote: Originally posted by WIN D on May 22, 2004 Find an example within any States Pick3 game where these 50/50 dvents have formed a consecutive pattern or string. Find one where it has gone on for at least 9 times in a row ......or TAILS (so to speak).[...] find any examples of this in any States game where this pattern has continued for 9 draws in a row. Odd or Even... high/low it does not matter. This is just a heads/tails situation. We will bet on the 10th. outcome. Since the odds are al
May 22, 2004, 7:33 pm - rdarmand - Lottery Systems Forum

Buying more tickets = reduced oddsReply
Quote: Originally posted by Colin F on May 07, 2004I don't plan to hit the big one. I'm concerned about increasing the 3's, 4's and 5's wins in for example a 6/49 Lotto for a given number of tickets... For the best systems it hinges on getting the 5's up more consistently and often. For the realists amongst us that is the challenge and enjoyment.The crunch is if there was a contest of 5 x 500 draw runs and the winner was the one who made the most dollars from the 3's, 4's and 5's then with you
May 9, 2004, 3:05 pm - ayenowitall - Lottery Discussion Forum

Buying more tickets = reduced oddsReply
This has been a very interesting discusion.One problem I see is that in discussing the odds, the idea of whether or not one should even buy that many tickets is also presented. That only confuses the issue and is not germain to the discussion.For example, it has been stated that if one buys 500 unique pick 3 tickets, then the odds of winning is 1 in 2 (or 50%). But then, the responses deal with the question of whether it is wise to buy 500 tickets. That is not the point of this thread.I have als
May 7, 2004, 4:26 pm - Jake649 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Buying more tickets = reduced oddsReply
Quote: Originally posted by BobP on May 07, 2004If you're playing a game of dodge ball and down to two players on your side and ten on the other the odds are 2 in 10 or 1 in 5. If an army has 10,000 guys and you have 1,000 how many must each of your men cover? Same with lottey tickets, each unique ticket covers a range of possibilities spliting the field among them for coverage. BobPThis whole issue is a matter of one's preferred perspective, rather than an issue of mathematical probability.
May 7, 2004, 3:59 pm - wiseone2 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Pick 3 System That Gaurantees a HitReply
QWEST46That's not exactly what I would use either, first because you want to also include doubles and triples, because you want to win as often as possible and second, because I would and do preffer to win straight instead of box or anyorder, but to help people who don't have any system or method that wins often enough or at all, it's a good start and it's better than just winning twice a week as with kzdj's method whatever that is.The 120 pick3 basic anyorder numbers are the same as the 720 sin
May 7, 2004, 1:24 pm - LANTERN - Lottery Systems Forum

Predictions - Are You Serious ?Reply
Quote: Originally posted by prob987 on May 02, 2004At the moment just before the first white ball is drawn you will have in the non-repeating set, a probability of 10 in 53 of having one number in either ticket. In the second set, sharing one number, you will have a probability of only 9 in 53 of having one number in either ticket. This means that you have an 18.9% of remaining in the game in the first case, and a 17.0% chance of remaining in the game in the second case. Clearly, before the f
May 2, 2004, 5:27 pm - Jake649 - Lottery Discussion Forum