- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 10:12 pm
You last visited
June 23, 2026, 8:00 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Search
Search the Lottery Post forums for the keyword(s) you specify
18 million if no winner
I heard they plan on making it $2 per play, but I haven't heard any mention of increasing the odds. Have you?
May 25, 2002, 10:17 am - MrHappy - Lottery Discussion Forum
TODD-Re: MEGA
I guess I understand that the states just foot the bill on the first drawing after it hits...It is just that THEY INFERRED that each roll-over was going to be at least $10 million when they were trying to sell the idea of this new game...I am personally just having a hard time rationalizing in my own mind the benefit when the odds change from 1 in 78 million to 1 in 135 million that the game pot is only being predicted at only $2 million more..If the 6/49 game is $12 million too and its odds are
May 22, 2002, 3:08 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum
To all who wrote re: why systems and pattern don't work!
Only fools play the sucker games or limit their play to say all the numbers in ten lines balanced so most lines have a mixed bag of factors that regularly show up in a lottery drawing.Don't get so hung up on the odds of winning 100% of the time. Apply the birthday paradox to the pick-3 and you will see the odds of a box number repeating are on the order of 50% within 15 drawings. There are lots of things you can do to narrow the choices down if you look for them.I've found a lot of it is attitud
May 20, 2002, 10:33 pm - BobP - Lottery Discussion Forum
$50 per week spent on MM = 1 win every 51,979 years!
i won the lotto in 1994. $34M over 25 years. i beat the odds.
May 18, 2002, 5:43 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum
Welfare Loss on BGMM 2nd Tier Price
% Increase in BGMM 2nd tier price is lower than the % increase in odds!
May 16, 2002, 11:49 am - Gamma Ray - Lottery Discussion Forum
Now it's official
You contradicted yourself. The odds of winning are independent of whoever else plays or the size of the jackpot.
May 15, 2002, 4:04 pm - CASH Only - Lottery Discussion Forum
BIGGAME PICKS FOR 05/07/02
That is a strange comment. The odds are against you in EVERY lottery game!Good luck ALJOE.-Todd
May 7, 2002, 3:47 am - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum
BIGGAME PICKS FOR 05/07/02
So, you are going waste all that money tomorrow? The odds are against you.
May 6, 2002, 8:42 pm - Guest - Lottery Discussion Forum
NJ Pick-3 Mid & Eve
Bret Schundler's chance of winning the 2005 gubernatorial election in NJ compares with the 1 in 135+ million odds of hitting Mega Millions :-)
May 5, 2002, 9:22 am - CASH Only - Lottery Discussion Forum
MUSL "Hot Lotto" $1.7 million ($930,000 cash) Saturday 5/4
The Super-6 game was created in 1998, long before PA was given permission to join a multi-state game. The jackpot odds are VERY long for a single-state game- 1 in nearly 40 million. This game was designed to build large jackpots, and, PA figured it would be hit less often if players could not choose all the numbers. This is the _only_ US jackpot game with automatic quick-picks. When PA joins Powerball this summer, it will no longer need Super-6 to build big jackpots. The right thing for PA would
May 2, 2002, 12:46 pm - CASH Only - Lottery Discussion Forum
