LiLSpeedy's Blog

The President-From a Canadian Perspective

The real problem with Americans and their disrespect for Obama—according to a Canadian

Written by William Thomas

There was a time not so long ago when Americans, regardless of their political stripes, rallied ’round their president. Once elected, the man who won the White House was no longer viewed as a Republican or Democrat, but the president of the United States. The oath of office was taken, the wagons were circled around the country’s borders, and it was America versus the rest of the world, with the president of all the people at the helm.

Suddenly President Barack Obama, with the potential to become an exceptional president, has become the glaring exception to that unwritten, patriotic rule.

Four days before Obama’s inauguration, before he officially took charge of the American government, Rush Limbaugh boasted publicly that he hoped the president would fail. Of course, when the president fails, the country flounders. Wishing harm upon your country in order to further your own narrow political views is selfish, sinister and a tad treasonous as well.

Subsequently, during his State of the Union address, which is pretty much a pep rally for America, an unknown congressional representative from South Carolina, later identified as Joe Wilson, stopped the show when he called the president of the United States a liar. The president showed great restraint in ignoring this unprecedented insult and carried on with his speech. Speaker Nancy Pelosi was so stunned by the slur, she forgot to jump to her feet while clapping wildly, 30 or 40 times after that.

Last spring, president Obama took his wife Michelle to see a play in New York City and Republicans attacked him over the cost of security for the excursion. The president can’t take his wife out to dinner and a show without being scrutinized by the political opposition? As history has proven, a president in a theater without adequate security is a tragically bad idea. (Remember: “Apart from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?”)

At some point, the treatment of president Obama went from offensive to ugly, and then to downright dangerous.

The healthcare debate, which looked more like extreme fighting in a mud pit than a national dialogue, revealed a very vulgar side of America. Obama’s face appeared on protest signs, white-faced and blood-mouthed in a satanic clown image. In other tasteless portrayals, people who disagreed with his position distorted his face to look like Hitler, complete with mustache and swastika.

Odd that burning the flag makes Americans crazy, but depicting the president as a clown and a maniacal fascist is accepted as part of the new rude America.

Maligning the image of the leader of the free world is one thing; putting the president’s life in peril is quite another. More than once, men with guns were videotaped at the healthcare rallies where the president spoke. Again, history shows that letting men with guns get within range of a president has not served America well in the past.

And still the “birthers” are out there claiming Barack Obama was not born in the United States, although public documentation proves otherwise. Hawaii is definitely part of the United States, but the Panama Canal Zone where his electoral opponent Senator John McCain was born? Nobody’s sure.

Last month, a 44-year-old woman in Buffalo was quite taken by president Obama when she met him in a chicken wing restaurant called Duff’s. Did she say something about a pleasure and an honor to meet the man, or utter encouraging words for the difficult job he is doing? No. Quote: “You’re a hottie with a smokin’ little body.”

Lady, that was the president of the United States you were addressing, not one of the Jonas Brothers! He’s your president, for goodness sakes, not the guy driving the Zamboni at “Monster Trucks On Ice.” Maybe next it’ll be, “Take Your President To A Topless Bar Day.”

In President Barack Obama, Americans have a charismatic leader with a good and honest heart. Unlike his predecessor, he’s a very intelligent leader. And unlike that president’s predecessor, he’s a highly moral man.

In president Obama, Americans have the real deal, the whole package, and a leader that citizens of almost every country around the world look to with great envy. Given the opportunity, Canadians would trade our leader—hell, most of our leaders—for Obama in a heartbeat.

What America has in Obama is a head of state with vitality and insight and youth. Think about it: Barack Obama is a young Nelson Mandela. Mandela was the face of change and charity for all of Africa, but he was too old to make it happen. The great things Obama might do for America and the world could go on for decades after he’s out of office.

America, you know not what you have.

The man is being challenged unfairly, characterized with vulgarity and treated with the kind of deep disrespect to which no previous president was subjected. It’s like the day after electing the first black man to be president, thereby electrifying the world with hope and joy, Americans sobered up and decided the bad old days were better.

President Obama may fail but it will not be a Richard Nixon default, fraught with larceny and lies. President Obama, given a fair chance, will surely succeed, but his triumph will never come with a Bill Clinton caveat—“if only he’d got control of that zipper.”

Please. Give the man a fair, fighting chance. This incivility toward the leader who won over Americans and gave hope to billions of people around the world that their lives could be enhanced by his example just has to stop.

Believe me, when Americans drive by the White House and see a sign on the lawn that reads, “No shirt. No shoes. No service,” they’ll realize this new national rudeness has gone way, way too far.

Entry #401

"Power is the enemy of new ideas"

Senate races hot on accusations, light on ideas----Everyone is talking loud and saying absolutely NOTHING!

Associated Press
By CHARLES BABINGTON
FILE - In this April 30, 2014 file photo, demonstrators sit in the rain on Capitol Hill in Washington during a protest calling for an end to deportations. This year’s Senate races have featured astronomical spending, ceaseless attack ads and innumerable slaps at a president who’s not on the ballot. Largely missing, however, are ideas on how best to govern the nation. Even with control of the Senate at stake, serious discussions about deficit spending, climate change, immigration, Social Security’s long-term future and other knotty issues rarely emerged. (AP Photo/Luis Alonso, File)
.
FILE - In this April 30, 2014 file photo, demonstrators sit in the rain on Capitol Hill in Washington during a protest calling for an end to deportations. This year’s Senate races have featured astronomical spending, ceaseless attack ads and innumerable slaps at a president who’s not on the ballot. Largely missing, however, are ideas on how best to govern the nation. Even with control of the Senate at stake, serious discussions about deficit spending, climate change, immigration, Social Security’s long-term future and other knotty issues rarely emerged. (AP Photo/Luis Alonso, File)
WASHINGTON (AP) — This year's Senate races have featured astronomical spending, ceaseless attack ads and innumerable slaps at a president who's not on the ballot. Largely missing, however, are ideas on how best to govern the nation.

Even with control of the Senate at stake, serious discussions about deficit spending, climate change, immigration, Social Security's long-term future and other knotty issues rarely emerged.

Republicans overwhelmingly devoted their campaigns to criticizing President Barack Obama's leadership and governing style. And Democrats, while sometimes forced to wanly defend "Obamacare," often caricatured their opponents as throwbacks eager to limit women's reproductive rights.

To be sure, superficial debates and 30-second attack ads have fueled U.S. political campaigns for years. But even by that measure, political veterans say, this fall's elections were remarkably light on policy and ideas.

"I'm struck by how not any of the significant issues that Congress has to deal with — immigration, infrastructure, a grand bargain on taxes and spending — are playing out in this election," said Steve Elmendorf, a former top Democratic congressional aide.

Some Democratic lawmakers weren't excited by a "Families First" agenda that party leaders wrote for the 1996 elections, Elmendorf said. "But we felt we had to have a policy umbrella to give to members."

"I don't think either side has done that this time," he said.

Campaign strategists say it's no surprise. From the start, Republicans centered their campaigns on tying their opponents to Obama's sinking popularity. As months passed, nothing reversed Obama's fortunes, and most Republicans saw no point in stirring things up with new proposals.

"When your opponents are destroying themselves, let them," said Texas-based Republican consultant Matt Mackowiak.

He said Republican leaders suppressed a request from some candidates for a party-wide platform or "contract" to highlight various ideas.

"When you do that, you give your opponents something to bash," Mackowiak said. "The strongest card we had to play was to run against the president."

Iowa's close Senate race was one where personal attacks and clever TV ads greatly overshadowed any discussion of how to tackle the nation's most pressing needs.

For Republicans, the breakthrough moment was a TV ad in which state Sen. Joni Ernst cheerily said she castrated hogs as a farm girl. The wink-wink reference to knowing how to "cut pork" propelled her to the GOP nomination and national attention.

For Democrat Bruce Braley, the biggest moment was a leaked video from a Texas fundraiser in which he warned lawyers that a farmer would chair the Senate Judiciary Committee if Republicans control the Senate. The apparent snub of six-term Republican Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa played badly in the farm-heavy state.

It was fitting, perhaps, that the Iowa contest's final weekend featured arguments about whether retiring Democratic Sen. Tom Harkin — whose seat is in play — made sexist comments about Ernst. That's what Republicans alleged after Harkin said many people find Ernst "really attractive, and she sounds nice."

Harkin continued, "I don't care if she's as good looking as Taylor Swift or as nice as Mr. Rogers, but if she votes like Michele Bachmann, she's wrong for the state of Iowa." Harkin apologized for the remarks Monday.

This year's issue that got the most campaign lip service was the president's 2010 health care overhaul, which Republicans call "Obamacare." Discussions, however, sometimes involved "a level of dissembling that's almost jaw-dropping," said congressional scholar Norm Ornstein.

He cited Republicans who vow to repeal the entire law while somehow restoring popular parts, such as requiring insurance companies to cover new customers who have serious health problems. Health officials say that pick-and-choose approach won't work, because it strips away revenue essential to pay for the popular features.

Democrats pressed congressional Republicans to spell out a plausible alternative to the health law. But GOP leaders, including House Speaker John Boehner, nixed the idea, leaving most Democrats to defend "Obamacare" without a competing plan to compare it to.

Ornstein said it might not matter much. America's voters are so divided, and so motivated by fear and anger, he said, "that whatever you say about issues isn't going to matter."

Some Virginia Republicans might unhappily agree. GOP Senate nominee Ed Gillespie, seen as trailing Democratic Sen. Mark Warner, was among the few Republicans nationwide to offer a comprehensive alternative to "Obamacare."

Gillespie's plan would no longer obligate people to obtain health insurance, but it would provide tax credits to help buy it. The proposal received modest attention in a contest dominated by TV ads that either accuse Warner of involvement in backroom political favoritism, or accuse Gillespie of being a profit-driven lobbyist.

John J. Pitney, Jr., a political scientist at Claremont McKenna College, says neither party is likely to produce policy proposals as long as they think the presidency or the House or Senate majority is within reach.

"Power is the enemy of new ideas," he said.

Entry #398

Early voting in Dekalb County was outstanding!

South DeKalb is showing up at the polls big time. At 5:45 this evening on the last day of early voting at the Gallery at South DeKalb, the wrap around line to vote was long and thick. Reminded me of the 2008 Presidential Election when folks showed to elect Barack Obama. Sweet to see!! Now on to Tuesday.

South DeKalb is showing up at the polls big time.
At 5:45 this evening on the last day of early voting at the Gallery at South DeKalb, the wrap around line to vote was long and thick. Reminded me of the 2008 Presidential Election when folks showed to elect Barack Obama. Sweet to see!! Now on to Tuesday. Yeah!

Entry #397

You can't believe everything that you read

Poll: Perdue Soars to 8-Point Lead Over Nunn in Georgia

Wednesday, 29 Oct 2014 09:36 PM

Businessman David Perdue has galloped to an 8-point lead over incumbent Georgia Democratic Sen. Michelle Nunn, a poll released Wednesday shows.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.Newsmax.com/Politics/David-Perdue-Michelle-Nunn-Georgia-Senate/2014/10/29/id/604025/#ixzz3HdvtTwMb

This is why one can’t believe everything that they read. Michelle Nunn is not an incumbent Senator nor is she a Senator. In my opinion, this was a Freudian slip. Newsmax is incompetent in their news reporting. Perdue has never had an 8-point lead. Latest polls show that they are neck and neck with Nunn having a slight edge thanks to her father's endorsement, the former Senator Sam Nunn, who is very popular in Georgia politics. He was a conservative Democrat. Yes we have them too. Surprise!
 

Entry #396

The Bradley Report

Stoned Rush Limbaugh Makes Hypocritical History
By Demanding Harsh Penalties For Other Drug Users

See the link below. It speaks about Rush's hypocrisy when concerning others that was hooked on drugs.

bradleyreport.net/commentary/StonedRush.htm 

Entry #395

Donald Trump to Mitt Romney: Don't Even Think of Running

Donald Trump to Mitt Romney: Don't Even Think of Running

Image: Donald Trump to Mitt Romney: Don't Even Think of Running Former Republican presidential candidate and Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, left, and Donald Trump. (Ethan Miller/Getty Images)
Former Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney should by no means make a bid for the presidency in 2016 because "he had his chance and he blew it," says real estate mogul Donald Trump.

In an interview Tuesday, Trump also expressed his disappointment with Romney's performance in the final four weeks of the 2012 campaign against President Barack Obama.

"No. I don't think he should run. He had his chance and he blew it," Trump told Breitbart News. "He had a great chance of winning. He should have won. That was an election that, frankly, should have been a much easier election than the probable 2016 candidate Hillary [Clinton]. That was an election that should have been won by the Republicans." 

Earlier this month, speculation mounted that Romney might make another presidential bid after a visit to Iowa to campaign on behalf of GOP Senate candidate Joni Ernst.

According to The Washington Post, confidants have said they think Romney is grappling with whether he would take up the challenge should the party draft him, while multiple GOP donors have pleaded with him to throw his hat into the ring.
 
Romney and his wife, Ann, have tried to stamp out speculation that he will make a bid, repeatedly saying he is not considering it.

"I'm not running and I'm not planning on running. I've got nothing to add to that story," he told supporters earlier this month while on the campaign trail in Georgia.

In two separate interviews last week, Ann Romney also ruled out a possible run. 

"Done," she told The Los Angeles Times. "Completely. Not only Mitt and I are done, but the kids are done," she said, in reference to their five sons. "Done. Done. Done."

She also made similar comments during an appearance on NBC's "Today" show.

Meanwhile, a Washington Post/ABC News poll out earlier this week found that Romney had the highest support among likely voters of any potential 2016 candidate, with 21 percent.
 
A Bloomberg/Des Moines Register poll last week showed that Romney would be the only potential GOP candidate who would beat former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Iowa in a hypothetical match-up.

Specifically, 44 percent of likely Iowa voters said they would support Romney, compared to 43 percent who said they would back Clinton.

Entry #394

This says it all...

By Daniel Kurtzman

Everyone is not impressed with the repubs. Counting your CHICKENS before the eggs hatch can lead to disappointing results. Stay tuned once again.

Entry #391

Government Experiments on Humans | List of Evil Government ...

The American people have every right to be suspicious when certain diseases or viruses suddenly appear out of nowhere. Our government has been experimenting on its own people for years. Much of it has been done in secret by organizations or agencies within our government that answer to no one. The following link list 13 of the most evil things done by these ungodly ghouls.

 

http://www.ranker.com/list/the-13-most-evil-u-s-government-experiments-on-humans/robert-wabash

Entry #390

Rush Limbaugh: Obama Wants Americans To Get Ebola As Payback For Slavery

rush limbaugh_tpftd

Radio host Rush Limbaugh suggested on Monday that President Obama is refusing to divert flights from Ebola-infected countries and close down America’s borders because he believes that the nation “deserves” to be infected with the virus given its history of perpetuating slavery.

Responding to a caller on his nationally syndicated radio show, Limbaugh launched into a soliloquy about so-called politically correct liberals who believe that America is responsible for the spread of Ebola in Liberia because that nation was established by freed American slaves. “And if it hadn’t been for that they probably wouldn’t have [Ebola]. So there are some people who think we kind of deserve a little bit of this,” he said, before accusing elected leaders of purposely leaving the country vulnerable to the virus.

“The danger we have now is that we elected people in positions of power and authority who think this or think like this in terms of this country being responsible, this country being to blame for things and it’s that kind of thinking that leads to opposition to shutting down airports from various countries,” Limbaugh explained, referring to the Obama administration’s handling of the crisis.

Rush is not only a big fat LIAR, but is a habitual drug user. His statements has gone from outrageous to CREEPY. But regardless of how bizarre Rush's behavior has become his flock view him as a guru and believe everything that he says. SAD.

Entry #389

Let's not get it twisted !

Ebola crisis: How did the virus get into the US?

A health worker in Monrovia

A Liberian man is the first person to be diagnosed with the deadly Ebola virus on US soil. So how did he arrive undetected and what are the risks to Americans?

The outbreak gripping West Africa is the world's worst, killing 3,338 people so far.

There have been 7,178 confirmed cases, with Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea suffering the most.

This case in the US is thought to be the first outside West Africa involving this strain of Ebola.

line

Who is the new patient in the US?

Thomas Eric Duncan

Only one person has been diagnosed with the virus while in the US.

Thomas Eric Duncan, a Liberian national, tested positive in Dallas, Texas, on 30 September.

He worked as a driver for a courier service and lived in the Paynesville 72nd Community suburb of Monrovia.

On 20 September, he arrived in Dallas to visit relatives and is now in a serious condition in an isolation unit at a hospital in the city.

line

Is he the first person in the US to have Ebola?

No, a small number of American aid workers who contracted the virus while abroad have recovered after flying back to the US for treatment. But Mr Duncan is the first diagnosed within the US.

Three of the aid workers were colleagues at the same hospital in Liberia. Kent Brantly and Nancy Writebol were flown back to Atlanta for treatment, while Rick Sacra, a family doctor from Massachusetts, recovered in Nebraska.

Ms Writebol said resources at the hospital where they worked were insufficient to protect workers.

On Thursday, it also emerged that a US journalist - a writer and cameraman - had tested positive in Liberia and will be flown home by NBC News.

Aid worker Nancy Writebol A month after returning to the US, Ms Writebol was well enough to speak to reporters
Entry #388