Search

Gambling addict is suing B.C. Lottery CorporationReply
Good point RJOh, the casino should sue her for breach of contract.
Jul 17, 2010, 11:59 pm - rdgrnr - Lottery News

Sisters' lottery jackpot trial begins todayReply
There's a really simple solution that will prevent you from ever finding yourself in this sort of position: don't agree to a bad contract. If a contract is bad enough it will be held to be invalid if it's challenged, but the government has no business protecting adults from every chance to make a poor decision that comes along. Considering that the sisters obviously had a substantial falling out it was obviously stupid of them to mutually agree to what was apparently a lifetime contract. That do
Mar 25, 2010, 1:59 am - KY Floyd - Lottery News

If you won the big jackpot...Reply
That's fine as long as they're not binded with a legal contract.
Jan 7, 2010, 4:27 am - badboy00z - Lottery Discussion Forum

Connecticut man sues friend for share of lottery prizeReply
Contract people, contracts! :D
May 18, 2009, 4:16 pm - diamondpalace - Lottery News

Dream number neededReply
contract 194 184 9642 572 369 696 7304
Apr 24, 2009, 9:04 am - hot mama - Mystical Forum

Is it wrong to...?Reply
The contract (which in this case would have to be argued as an oral contract) is simply this: Buy the person a ticket with the money they gave you. That's it. The supposed contract was fulfilled. There is no obligation for the person buying the tickets to not buy a ticket with the same numbers. They have every right to buy a ticket with the same numbers. You own the ticket, not the numbers on the ticket.
Dec 1, 2008, 2:24 am - Guru101 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Do you have the "FEELING" that you'll win or just the "HOPE"?Reply
Okay, when we finally get a record contract which will be the 'A' side?
Jun 13, 2008, 12:52 am - justxploring - Lottery Discussion Forum

Camelot beats off rivals to win UK Lottery for next 12 yearsReply
Why did Camelot win contract in UK Lotto? When does the contract begin for Camelot? What other rivals did Camelot beat to win the contract?
Aug 14, 2007, 1:00 pm - Just6ntlc - Lottery News

You buy a 2line ticket to pool with 1 person but they don't pay the $1Reply
I just went back into my post to delete 1/2 of it. Too late! (got a knock at the door) I just read the other posts again and I don't want to get into a battle about contracts. I think some people are going way overboard with this whole idea. I can almost guarantee that no court would rule that this was a legal contract. People make promises to each other all the time and can't prove them. Here is a great quote from Law.com about a verbal contract: an agreement made with spoken wo
Mar 22, 2007, 8:52 pm - justxploring - Lottery Discussion Forum

You buy a 2line ticket to pool with 1 person but they don't pay the $1Reply
You clearly had a contract with your coworker to split the cost and split any winnings, and you clearly agreed to buy the ticket on their behalf and be paid later. You clearly bought the ticket with the intent that you would be co-owners with equal shares. At that point the coworker owns half of the ticket. That they don't pay on time is a separate issue from ownership. If you were ever late with a credit card payment and didn't take the merchandise back to the store you've already agreed that
Mar 21, 2007, 11:25 am - KY Floyd - Lottery Discussion Forum